FORUM
MANUAL
GET TREMULOUS
Tremulous forum
May 22, 2013, 08:01:53 PM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News
: Come Chat with us live! Learn how
HERE!
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
T R E M U L O U S
>
General
>
Announcements
>
1.2 Gameplay Changes
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
13
14
...
18
Go Down
Print
Author
Topic: 1.2 Gameplay Changes (Read 152772 times)
FisherP
Turrets: +31/-32
Posts: 295
No, I'm not a Potatoe
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #240 on:
November 04, 2009, 07:38:11 PM »
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 27, 2009, 09:36:52 PM
... and I felt it was much more important to give builders the freedom to build forward without feeding the enemy team. And it's turned out that having forward bases encourages offense a lot more anyway.
I agree with temple, reward for destroying base = win. If there's no benefit to destroying bases then I'd just camp outside the base and kill whore till SD, and with Share switched on the whole team would be stocked with evos. Or on the flip side, no point in leaving base, I'll just ret hug and pick off the aliens too slow to leave the base, get creds that way.
Logged
Jedarus
Turrets: +35/-10
Posts: 280
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #241 on:
November 04, 2009, 09:13:50 PM »
It's good that I don't have to bind sprint to my movement keys any more. It's much better toggling it imo
Logged
Quote from: Creative1
Go get some gasoline and light your fucking pubes on fire
Cadynum
Turrets: +29/-13
Posts: 222
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #242 on:
November 05, 2009, 01:12:25 AM »
Quote from: FisherP on November 04, 2009, 07:38:11 PM
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 27, 2009, 09:36:52 PM
... and I felt it was much more important to give builders the freedom to build forward without feeding the enemy team. And it's turned out that having forward bases encourages offense a lot more anyway.
I agree with temple, reward for destroying base = win. If there's no benefit to destroying bases then I'd just camp outside the base and kill whore till SD, and with Share switched on the whole team would be stocked with evos. Or on the flip side, no point in leaving base, I'll just ret hug and pick off the aliens too slow to leave the base, get creds that way.
There is no share in 1.2
Reward for killing base = you win the game.
One could also argue that if buildings give money, people would camp more to protect them.
Logged
Lakitu7
Tremulous Developers
Turrets: +120/-73
Posts: 1002
Watch for spinys
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #243 on:
November 05, 2009, 01:59:13 AM »
If you're a scoreboard whore, destroying buildings does give you way more points than anything else.
Logged
Blood-Lord
Turrets: +1/-1
Posts: 15
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #244 on:
November 05, 2009, 01:59:57 AM »
this might be a bit random for a few of you people, but i just took a look at some of the textures that you guys have done to the aliens/weapons/humans, and to any of you developers who see this, You did an amazing Job.
Logged
danmal
Turrets: +21/-6
Posts: 244
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #245 on:
November 05, 2009, 05:05:30 AM »
Quote from: Cadynum on November 05, 2009, 01:12:25 AM
There is no share in 1.2
Yeah, for about 5 minutes until someone releases a QVM with share.
Quote from: Lakitu7 on November 05, 2009, 01:59:13 AM
If you're a scoreboard whore, destroying buildings does give you way more points than anything else.
Ohh, screw credits then. I'll just whore the buildings for a while then. In all honesty score > credits.
Logged
Celestial_Rage
Turrets: +120/-8
Posts: 623
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #246 on:
November 05, 2009, 05:08:50 AM »
Quote from: Lakitu7 on November 05, 2009, 01:59:13 AM
If you're a scoreboard whore, destroying buildings does give you way more points than anything else.
If it gives you points, why shouldn't they give evos/credits?
I think that spawns and main structures should give credits/evos as, if nothing else, a punishment for building them badly. My main purpose of this is so that if someone rushes a base when it is empty and manages to take out the OM or something, but dies, he is gains nothing from it unless the entire team takes advantage of it (and from my experience with 1.1, maybe 2-4 of the better players actually rush when you tell them to and I doubt 1.2 shall be any different). If the entire team does not take advantage, the exploit goes to waste, and it is very likely that the rusher used up the last of his credits in that rush, and is thus, left creditless in the rush. If they got credits, they would be able to rush again and do more damage. This, gives more motivation to rush, especially for humans, if they can take out forward bases and win some easy credits.
Logged
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated" ~Mark Twain
Silver
Turrets: +307/-62
Posts: 376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #247 on:
November 05, 2009, 10:00:09 AM »
Quote from: Lakitu7 on November 05, 2009, 01:59:13 AM
If you're a scoreboard whore, destroying buildings does give you way more points than anything else.
That almost makes it feel off how it should feel. I don't want some faggot picking off acid tubes to look better on the scoreboard when I'm dueling it out with rants. I also agree that main structures should at least give some revenue reward.
Logged
I SUKC AT TRMELUS
IABZ IS JESUS
temple
Turrets: +37/-42
Posts: 534
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #248 on:
November 05, 2009, 10:32:28 AM »
How is someone going to be picking off acid tubes without dealing with rants? How are acid tubes going to be worth more than a rant? That's a crazy assumption.
Everything contributes to winning a game. So killing structures should give a reward just like killing players. There shouldn't be a gap in how credits/evos are handled.
Someone said that if structures give credits/evos, then people will camp them. Well....they camp them anyway. There still should be an incentive for risking your credits/evos to siege the enemy's base. Otherwise, players will not have the credits/evos to attack the base again.
You can't stop people from camping. You can punish people for camping. But regardless of that, you can also reward those who do something else. The problem is the only way to earn upgrades is by killing enemy players. And enemy players can sit in their base and effectively halt the game and halt their opponents from getting any credits without SUPER ELITE SKILLS.
Logged
Silver
Turrets: +307/-62
Posts: 376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #249 on:
November 05, 2009, 04:36:27 PM »
Temple, in my experience there is a lot of noobs who run off and pick off lower ATCS base thats almost irelevant while the rest of us are holding off tyrants at our base or down the hallway. I'd rather people focus on eggs and the overmind since those are the structures that actually matter, but not noobs who manage out of base will have score incentive to go after acide tubes and barricades and other structures that other than Sudden Death hold no impactual reason to destroy. If they're built well and you need to get past them thats the only reason and thats the only incentive you should need. Most people find running past them/luci jumping more effective to the game and it fits well because those structures still do damage in that instance where as with human's range if they were overpowering those structures would be completely useless.
Logged
I SUKC AT TRMELUS
IABZ IS JESUS
Lakitu7
Tremulous Developers
Turrets: +120/-73
Posts: 1002
Watch for spinys
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #250 on:
November 05, 2009, 05:23:20 PM »
Actually, picking off outer structures is useful because queued BP means it will take time before they or anything else can be rebuilt. Do it enough and you're picking off inner structures until there is nothing left.
Logged
A Spork
Spam Killer
Turrets: +37/-230
Posts: 1010
rawr
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #251 on:
November 05, 2009, 06:58:22 PM »
Maybe so, but I was playing last night on 1.2, and I rushed, and destroyed 90% of the alien base, but a granger got away, and I died from exploding structures, so I had no creds to chase down the granger, and he managed to get his entire base rebuilt.
So, IMHO, OM/RC + Nodes/Eggs + Booster/Arm-medi should give creds/evos.
Logged
Don't shoot friend
! Friend
only wants to give you hugz and to be your hat
Proud Member of the S.O.B.F.O.B.S.A.D: The Society Of Basilisks For Other Basilisks Safety and Dominance
Lakitu7
Tremulous Developers
Turrets: +120/-73
Posts: 1002
Watch for spinys
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #252 on:
November 05, 2009, 07:20:21 PM »
I don't particularly disagree but I'm not the one to convince.
Logged
David
Spam Killer
Turrets: +249/-273
Posts: 3543
David
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #253 on:
November 05, 2009, 07:36:20 PM »
Why can't you run down a granger with a rifle? And where were your team?
(I agree that the base should give some funds somehow)
Logged
Any maps not in the MG repo? Email me or come to irc.freenode.net/#mg.
--
My words are mine and mine alone. I can't speak for anyone else, and there is no one who can speak for me. If I ever make a post that gives the opinions or positions of other users or groups, then they will be clearly labeled as such.
I'm disappointed that people's past actions have forced me to state what should be obvious.
I am not a dev. Nothing I say counts for anything.
A Spork
Spam Killer
Turrets: +37/-230
Posts: 1010
rawr
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #254 on:
November 05, 2009, 08:15:06 PM »
It was in Nexus6, and it was 3v2.....Wallwalk makes it easy for him to get away....
Logged
Don't shoot friend
! Friend
only wants to give you hugz and to be your hat
Proud Member of the S.O.B.F.O.B.S.A.D: The Society Of Basilisks For Other Basilisks Safety and Dominance
Flux
Turrets: +88/-18
Posts: 221
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #255 on:
November 06, 2009, 04:02:23 AM »
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 31, 2009, 04:37:05 PM
Evolving no longer resets your velocity.
so can u like be a goon and pounce into hummie base while evolving into rant and hop rc/eat base with rant?
Logged
Lakitu7
Tremulous Developers
Turrets: +120/-73
Posts: 1002
Watch for spinys
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #256 on:
November 06, 2009, 04:34:15 AM »
In theory, but you could do that in 1.1 as well. In 1.1 you needed to be directly overhead. In 1.2 you need to be on your way there.
Logged
Silver
Turrets: +307/-62
Posts: 376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #257 on:
November 06, 2009, 05:47:28 AM »
Quote from: Lakitu7 on November 05, 2009, 05:23:20 PM
Actually, picking off outer structures is useful because queued BP means it will take time before they or anything else can be rebuilt. Do it enough and you're picking off inner structures until there is nothing left.
In an involved team effort yes, one lone rifle couldn't keep up with the queued BP most likely. It is mostly pointless bitter against some random noob getting score for not doing anything effective. I also would rather have people focus on main structures first, taking out eggs will hurt aliens far more than taking out tubes ever could since aliens rely on themselves as the biggest point of defense being able to spawn effeciently is far more positive. Which is why vital structures like spawns and power sources shoul definitely retun revenue credit while defense structures shouldn't, this way it encourages people to work towards ending the game, not killwhoring acid tubes to make their score higher.
Logged
I SUKC AT TRMELUS
IABZ IS JESUS
UniqPhoeniX
Spam Killer
Turrets: +66/-32
Posts: 1376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #258 on:
November 06, 2009, 09:10:36 AM »
Quote from: Flux on November 06, 2009, 04:02:23 AM
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 31, 2009, 04:37:05 PM
Evolving no longer resets your velocity.
so can u like be a goon and pounce into hummie base while evolving into rant and hop rc/eat base with rant?
Great idea! On Tremor and Transit especially, guess I'll be using that to get armories in 1.2 lol.
Logged
Ingar's NetRadiant
Silver
Turrets: +307/-62
Posts: 376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #259 on:
November 06, 2009, 09:13:05 AM »
Quote from: UniqPhoeniX on November 06, 2009, 09:10:36 AM
Quote from: Flux on November 06, 2009, 04:02:23 AM
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 31, 2009, 04:37:05 PM
Evolving no longer resets your velocity.
so can u like be a goon and pounce into hummie base while evolving into rant and hop rc/eat base with rant?
Great idea! On Tremor and Transit especially, guess I'll be using that to get armories in 1.2 lol.
I'd definitely use that on atcs with lisk or goon to get up top and evolve into rant in the process. Can you imagine just seeing a rant flying over the top at pouncing speeds?
Logged
I SUKC AT TRMELUS
IABZ IS JESUS
temple
Turrets: +37/-42
Posts: 534
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #260 on:
November 06, 2009, 10:45:54 AM »
Aliens can't evolve near humans, so this whole flying goon to rant idea isn't possible in any useful situation.
Logged
KamikOzzy
Turrets: +317/-172
Posts: 733
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #261 on:
November 06, 2009, 12:33:53 PM »
Quote from: temple on November 06, 2009, 10:45:54 AM
Aliens can't evolve near humans, so this whole flying goon to rant idea isn't possible in any useful situation.
Are you sure? You can start your pounce, evolve, and be barreling through the air with your rant before you get close enough to humans to disallow evolving, right? Does sound kinda like some bs if it works that way.
Lakitu I think you're wrong this time, cause in 1.1 what temple said *is* completely relevant. You would have to be right above the base when you evolve, and it would say too close to enemies.
Logged
|AoD|Ozzyshka at your service.
Still using Windows XP
and still playing 1.1
click this:
http://cornersrocks.shop-pro.jp/?pid=16232798
danmal
Turrets: +21/-6
Posts: 244
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #262 on:
November 06, 2009, 12:43:52 PM »
Quote from: KamikOzzy on November 06, 2009, 12:33:53 PM
Are you sure? You can start your pounce, evolve, and be barreling through the air with your rant before you get close enough to humans to disallow evolving, right?
If anyone ever manages to do that then I will crown them king of Tremulous.
Quote from: Silver on November 06, 2009, 05:47:28 AM
In an involved team effort yes, one lone rifle couldn't keep up with the queued BP most likely. It is mostly pointless bitter against some random noob getting score for not doing anything effective.
Honestly I'd prefer them whittling away the bases defenses then kill whoring. Plus aliens are always running through their base so that guy will no doubt need to deal with aliens soonish.
Logged
Silver
Turrets: +307/-62
Posts: 376
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #263 on:
November 06, 2009, 01:40:38 PM »
Quote from: danmal on November 06, 2009, 12:43:52 PM
Quote from: Silver on November 06, 2009, 05:47:28 AM
In an involved team effort yes, one lone rifle couldn't keep up with the queued BP most likely. It is mostly pointless bitter against some random noob getting score for not doing anything effective.
Honestly I'd prefer them whittling away the bases defenses then kill whoring. Plus aliens are always running through their base so that guy will no doubt need to deal with aliens soonish.
Which is exactly why its an issue. Someone can go kill 1 maybe 2 tubes get killed and looking at the score board most people wouldn't realize he's feeding when he really is. He would be giving the aliens evos and score while only obtaining a very minor amount of score that wouldn't be helping us any. It will just encourage people to work on irelevant items and feed the aliens revenue.
I don't encourage kill whoring either, but whats better about killwhoring tubes that don't give revenue to get upgrades instead of dretches? I would prefer people take out as many big aliens as they can and after they've banked up revenue work on *proper* base rushes that include focusing on eggs and the overmind.
Logged
I SUKC AT TRMELUS
IABZ IS JESUS
danmal
Turrets: +21/-6
Posts: 244
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #264 on:
November 06, 2009, 09:55:04 PM »
Quote from: Silver on November 06, 2009, 01:40:38 PM
I don't encourage kill whoring either, but whats better about killwhoring tubes that don't give revenue to get upgrades instead of dretches? I would prefer people take out as many big aliens as they can and after they've banked up revenue work on *proper* base rushes that include focusing on eggs and the overmind.
They don't though. Instead they usually kill whore all the nice easy to kill dretches with their luci canon and 2000 credits. Not only that but as people have mentioned before you don't get the BP back from destroyed structures straight away (especially if you're close to max BP) so that base could be without those tubes for a while.
Even if you could tell that the player isn't doing much how does that help you? Most servers don't allow you to kick total noobies for being terrible at the game. If you really do need/want a detailed breakdown of what each player is doing then something like F-SIT would probably be your best bet.
Logged
Norfenstein
Turrets: +81/-77
Posts: 628
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #265 on:
November 06, 2009, 11:27:24 PM »
Quote from: Norfenstein on October 31, 2009, 12:34:32 PM
Quote from: Vector_Matt on October 30, 2009, 04:57:10 PM
What does "projectile volume 5 (against entities but not map architecture)" mean in the weapon descriptions?
It means, basically, that the projectile has a volume of 1 unit cubed with respect to walls and floors, but of 5 units cubed with respect to players and structures. So you can shoot through 1-unit wide hole in a wall, but when shooting between a wall and a dretch that's up to 5 units away from the wall, you will hit the dretch.
My apologies, 5 is actually the "radius" of the cube; they're 10 units on a side. Changelog corrected and clarified.
Quote from: Celestial_Rage on November 05, 2009, 05:08:50 AM
My main purpose of this is so that if someone rushes a base when it is empty and manages to take out the OM or something, but dies, he is gains nothing from it unless the entire team takes advantage of it (and from my experience with 1.1, maybe 2-4 of the better players actually rush when you tell them to and I doubt 1.2 shall be any different). If the entire team does not take advantage, the exploit goes to waste, and it is very likely that the rusher used up the last of his credits in that rush, and is thus, left creditless in the rush.
This is intentional. Players fight each other to build up funds; the team that gets more attacks and loses their advantage; repeat. Or they win the game. Teamwork helps.
Quote from: Celestial_Rage on November 05, 2009, 05:08:50 AM
If they got credits, they would be able to rush again and do more damage.
This didn't happen when we tried it.
Quote from: A Spork on November 05, 2009, 06:58:22 PM
Maybe so, but I was playing last night on 1.2, and I rushed, and destroyed 90% of the alien base, but a granger got away, and I died from exploding structures, so I had no creds to chase down the granger, and he managed to get his entire base rebuilt.
So, IMHO, OM/RC + Nodes/Eggs + Booster/Arm-medi should give creds/evos.
If you were the only one attacking then the aliens deserved to recover. It's a team game, and making it play well with fewer than six players isn't a high priority.
Logged
Celestial_Rage
Turrets: +120/-8
Posts: 623
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #266 on:
November 07, 2009, 01:18:19 AM »
Norf, I understand that Tremulous is
meant
to be a team game, but in all reality, it will not actually be one, with the exception of pickup games and scrims. The most a team will be able to scrape together will be maybe two or three people. And since you seem to be designing it to be balanced for the masses and not necessarily for scrims, which are definitely more strategic and teamwork based. Also, you seem to refer back to your dev games a lot. Last time I played in your planned dev games, I got yelled at for going out alone even though I doubt I was feeding The dev games are played much like pickup games and not at all like regular games will be played since everyone who plays is somewhat into tremulous already.
Logged
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated" ~Mark Twain
khalsa
Administrator
Turrets: +187/-132
Posts: 591
Dharam De rakhvalae
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #267 on:
November 07, 2009, 01:30:12 AM »
Whatever dude, I feed like crazy and so do many many other people in the alpha/dev games
Logged
}MG{
Mercenariesguild
ਮਨੁ ਜੀਤੇ ਜਗੁ ਜੀਤਿਆ
Big Server Sale
your face
Community Moderators
Turrets: +109/-407
Posts: 3533
really your face here
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #268 on:
November 07, 2009, 01:41:06 AM »
Quote from: Celestial_Rage on November 07, 2009, 01:18:19 AM
....with the exception of pickup games and scrims.
blackoutblackoutblackoutblackoutblackout
Logged
{NoS}
Y
our
F
ace
Quote from: codercon
Tremulous is probally the best freeware you will ever play. whats better then being a humman gunning down aliens or an alied killing soem humans.
(11:53:30 AM) Koragg: Oh god all channels red
Celestial_Rage
Turrets: +120/-8
Posts: 623
Re: 1.2 Gameplay Changes
«
Reply #269 on:
November 07, 2009, 02:41:41 AM »
Quote from: khalsa on November 07, 2009, 01:30:12 AM
Whatever dude, I feed like crazy and so do many many other people in the alpha/dev games
I guess I got on on a bad day. Sorry, but that was just my experience.
Logged
"The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated" ~Mark Twain
Pages:
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
[
9
]
10
11
12
13
14
...
18
Go Up
Print
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General
-----------------------------
=> Announcements
=> General Discussion
=> Troubleshooting
=> Feedback
=> Official Servers
-----------------------------
Community
-----------------------------
=> Servers
===> Server Admin Contacts
=> Clans
===> Individual Clan Threads
=> Strategies and Tactics
=> Mod Ideas and Desires
=> Off Topic
-----------------------------
Media
-----------------------------
=> Mapping Center
=> Map Releases
=> Modeling Center
=> Other Tremulous Media
-----------------------------
Mods
-----------------------------
=> Modding Center
=> Mod Releases
===> HUDs
===> Gameplay Changing
===> Non-Gameplay Changing
===> Tools and Utilities
Loading...